The Extinction of Bipartisanship

Image by Sammi Cardoso

By Leana Pardo

Why isn’t anything in American politics bipartisan anymore? According to a Pew Research study, “Republicans and Democrats are more divided along ideological lines – and partisan antipathy is deeper and more extensive – than at any point in the last two decades (Center, 2014).” But aren’t there a lot of issues that require bipartisan support? How did the Violence Against Women Act become a “liberal cause?” Understandably The GOP wasn’t a fan of the additions to the bill including transgender women and Native American women on reservations, but really guys, we can’t even agree on giving money to domestic violence and rape centers to protect women? What about denying that a country <cough, cough> Russia has influenced the 2016 election? Is that enough to get both sides support? What will it take?

We began 2017 with controversial cabinet confirmation hearings, a historic Women’s March, a ban on refugees, deportation of non-violent illegal felons, airport protests, a ban on travelers from seven Muslim countries, White House leaks, media wars, top official’s resignations, and this was only one month of Donald Trump being in office! It has been hard to prioritize the biggest news stories that require the most attention, because there have been and continues to be too many. However, there is one that should have been at the top of every American’s list: Russia. This isn’t a regular news story. This is THE NEWS STORY. And unfortunately Russia’s infiltration isn’t getting the attention it deserves or the bipartisan support it needs to be fully investigated.

There were several times during campaign season where The Democratic National Committee’s computer system had been hacked. “After closer investigation, these emails were traced to hackers signing in Clinton’s teams’ accounts from a region in Ukraine” (Lipton, Sanger, & Shane , 2016). Each month there were documents dumped onto WikiLeaks which hurt the Clinton campaign. The press focused more on the server Clinton used instead of how and why the emails were readily available for the world to see. With all of the fake news accusations circulating, it’s becoming harder to distinguish fact from alternative fact. Russian hacking was overshadowed with Trump’s knack for grabbing female genitalia.  However, there was a turning point in the Russian accusations that should have received much more attention and outrage from both parties. In early December, the CIA concluded that Russia tried tipping the American election in Trump’s favor (Kelly, 2016). Later 17 government agencies, including the FBI and NSA, determined that Russia had, in fact, interfered with the election. This should have been Washington’s main focus.  On a bipartisan level, the government should have halted and investigated these conclusions further. However, it was business as usual on the American political-crazy-train. Although it should be noted that President Obama made all Russian diplomats leave the country and created sanctions on Russia as retaliation.

There have been a few red flags along the way. Questions arose as to why billionaire Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson had been appointed Secretary of State. Tillerson has close ties to Russia. He has even been awarded the Order of Friendship by Vladimir Putin in 2011–one of the highest honors Russia can award a foreign citizen. Concerns were raised during Tillerson’s confirmation hearings but ultimately he was confirmed. Another recent red flag was when British ex-spy, Christopher Steele, compiled the infamous dossier detailing Trump’s dealings with Russia. “Mr. Steele has an excellent reputation with American and British intelligence colleagues and had done work for the F.B.I. on the investigation of bribery at FIFA, soccer’s global governing body” (Shane , Confessore , & Rosenberg, 2017). Although many Americans fixated on Trump’s alleged sexual acts involving prostitutes and streams of urine, more than embarrassing sex tapes was outlined. The dossier summarized, “real estate deals that were intended as bribes and coordination with Russian intelligence of the hacking of Democrats” (Shane , Confessore , & Rosenberg, 2017). The most recent bombshell involving Russia unleashed when National Security Advisor Michael Flynn resigned from his position. “Flynn is under fire for a discussion he had with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on the day that the U.S. announced sanctions for cyber-hacking that occurred during the U.S. election” (Harrington & Naylor, 2017). Earlier this year, the Department of Justice and the former Attorney General, Sally Yates, who was fired by Trump, warned the White House that Michael Flynn could be susceptible to blackmail by Russia. Donald Trump was told of Michael Flynn’s conversation with the Russian official on January 26th, 2017, but it wasn’t until mid-February that any action was taken. There are so many unanswered questions. It has become extremely difficult to get any information since President Trump dismisses anything Russian-related as fake news.

The threat of Russia’s infiltration of the American government has become increasingly real. It’s shocking that this has somehow become a partisan issue. In our extreme polarized political state, bipartisanship has become nearly extinct. It’s difficult to defect on your political party when the other side seems remote from your own ideology, but at times it must be done. It has taken me years into President Obama’s term to admit aloud that I disagreed with his foreign policy and his disciplinary actions of whistle-blowers. I felt like a traitor. But I had to admit it; in my eyes, he was a drone-airstrike-loving bully with opposite foreign policy views than my own. He is still my favorite president, and I believe the good outweighed the bad. However, I had to start admitting his flaws, or I wouldn’t be true to myself. Attention must be given to Trump’s ties with Russia immediately. Democrats are the minority in Washington right now, and the only way this can be done is with Republican support. There is a major crisis in the American government, and it cannot withstand being brushed aside and divided by party lines. This should be enraging people who call themselves an American. You can be pro-Trump and/or pro-Republican and still be concerned about Russia. The two aren’t mutually exclusive. To request an investigation into Russia and demand answers regarding a foreign country subverting our democracy doesn’t make anyone a traitor for going against Trump. It makes them a patriot.

 

Bibliography

Center, P. R. (2014, June 12). Political Polarization in the American Public. Retrieved February 2017, 20, from Pew Research: http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/

Harrington , D., & Naylor, B. (2017, February 14). 6 Unanswered Questions After Michael Flynn’s Resignation. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from NPR.org: v

Kelly, M. L. (2016, December 10 ). CIA Concludes Russian Interference Aimed To Elect Trump. Retrieved 21 2017, February , from NPR.org: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/10/505072304/cia-concludes-russian-interference-aimed-to-elect-trump

Lipton , E., Sanger, D. E., & Shane , S. (2016, December 13). The Perfect Weapon: How Russian Cyberpower Invaded the U.S. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html

Shane , S., Confessore , N., & Rosenberg, M. (2017, January 11). How a Sensational, Unverified Dossier Became a Crisis for Donald Trump. Retrieved February 21, 2017, from The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-intelligence.html?hp&amp;action=click&amp;pgtype=Homepage&amp;clickSource=story-heading&amp;module=a-lede-package-region&amp;region=top-news&amp;WT.nav=top-news

Listen Liberals, We Messed up too

Image by Sammi Cardoso

By Leana Pardo 

Before November 9, 2016, I had no patience for conservative ideology. Zero. The day Donald Trump won the presidency I had a very public social media meltdown. I was pointing fingers. I was calling out his supporters. I was defriending anyone that mentioned “building a wall.” I was not in a good place. I called my father fired up. 

Me: “Pop! Can you believe this? These uneducated white men! That’s why we lost!”

Pop: “We lost because of EDUCATED WHITE WOMEN, Leana! They were too embarrassed to say they were voting for a misogynist.”

BOOM! 

Instantly I became ashamed of my identity. Being half Latina didn’t translate in my looks. I was an educated white woman on a census form. 

Me: “Well, it’s these uneducated racist white men that wanted “their” country back! And that’s a demographic not even an insult.”

Pop: “And here’s the problem. How dare you call these people uneducated white men? That is an insult as a demographic! And since when are people with a high school diploma and a degree from trade school uneducated? THIS IS WHY LIBERALS DON’T WIN. YOU THINK YOU’RE SMARTER THAN EVERYONE!” 

*** MIC DROP***

I tell this story, because it was an eye-opener for me. I live in a liberal elite bubble. I can sit here and rattle off social policies for the hell of it. I surround myself with people that have similar beliefs as I do, and I tend to forget that not everyone reads Michelle Alexander’s “The New Jim Crowe” about mass incarceration for fun. 

I watch my father talk to Republicans with such eloquence and grace. He doesn’t point a finger and scream “STUPID! RACIST!” He has a real discussion with them. He listens. He educates. And then he leaves the topic alone and continues with whatever else is on the table of conversations. I’m trying. Don’t get me wrong it’s frustrating. It’s disconcerting when someone says all lives matter and racism doesn’t exist anymore. It’s mind-boggling when people say climate change isn’t real. It hurts when I hear victim-blaming after violent acts against women, but screaming “racist” is just pushing people away. Saying “read a book dummy” is ensuring the person won’t read up on climate change. Shouting “misogynistic pig” is creating a deeper divide. I am not saying you shouldn’t debate all of these issues. You absolutely should, but personally I have to start doing it in a better way. I’m trying not to use insults as hard as it may be. Sometimes people just don’t know. Some may be stubborn and racist, but many may be misinformed and less equipped with knowledge on American politics. 

I wonder if majority of the women marching at the Women’s March knew that the feminist movement only protected white women and excluded minority women. In addition, many may not have realized that the March was “peaceful” not because the women were well-mannered but because white women (people) receive protection from police that a BLM or Standing Rock protest wouldn’t have received. Facts like these help educate those who are unaware, and it’s our job to educate. If a person is asking what pronoun to call a transgendered person out of curiosity, please try not to shame them and exclaim “I can’t believe you didn’t know that!” Explain to them gender-neutral pronouns so they know for the future. Are they really the ones you should be picking the fight with? Or is it the Mike Pences of the world that hate the LGBTQ community we should be worrying about? Liberal on liberal arguments are so counter-productive. 

Since November 9th, I’ve really tried to change how I discuss politics. It’s my passion, and I believe I’m very educated in the topic but who can take me serious if I’m calling half the country dumb? Hopefully this Resistance Movement will open the eyes of many to a dark world of American oppression. But for those of us who are already there, lets try to do this respectfully. When I debate with a Republican I talk to myself and think, “Leana, use words; use your words” like what I tell my 6-year-old when she’s having a temper tantrum, I feel her pain. I want to cry out, “sea levels are rising, morons! We don’t have four years to convince you about a fact!” But that’s not constructive. Trust me. I’ve been doing it this way for years, and it isn’t working. Before I engage in a political debate I ask myself, “what would Obama do?” The man had a full eight years of insults, and he handled them professionally well. He was stern in his decisions but eloquent in his explanations. He was aggressive but never insulting. I believe the Democratic Party needs a strong leader. All of us can’t be Anthony Weiner screaming on the House floor, or no one will take us seriously. Half of my high school friends on Facebook have blocked me due to my berating words. I didn’t exactly enjoy their social media presence, but is this really progress if we just defriend who we choose to silence? Should we listen and ask questions? Barack Obama won places that Hillary Clinton didn’t even campaign in. He included everyone in his plans for the country. And I was the first to applaud Hill on the “deplorables” comment, which ultimately only hurt The Democrats. I am sucking up my pride and learning from Hilary’s mistake and mine. As challenging as it has been, they’ve gone low, but we’ve gone even lower. Let’s stick to the motto and go higher or find the balance where neither tips over the other. 

Tag Democrats; You’re it!


By Leana Pardo 

This week on Donald Trump Fucks America, we learned that his Supreme Court Justice nominee is Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, a federal appeals court judge in Denver, Colorado. He will be replacing Justice Antonin Scalia who passed away during Barak Obama’s presidency in February of 2016. Supreme Court Justices are given a lifetime appointment, so the president’s decision greatly impacts American policy even after he leaves office. This is one of the most prestigious positions in the United States to hold. So what does this mean for the Supreme Court? That Ruth Bader Ginsberg must live forever? Basically.

The Senate Democrats will have to ask themselves a very important question when it comes to confirming the new nominee: take the high road or play the Republicans’ game? The appointment clause in the Constitution gives the acting president the power to nominate a Supreme Court Justice when there is a vacancy and the Senate later confirms the nominee (Foundation, 2012). President Obama nominated moderate leaning Judge Merrick Garland for the position and the Republican-run Senate refused to even grant the nominee a committee hearing (Board, 2017). The Republicans made a decision early on that they would refuse Obama’s nominee, even if he was qualified. This caused a dilemma for the Supreme Court because, while it is supposed to have nine Justices, it has operated with only eight for the last ten months. Issues can arise when big cases are heard because the Court consists of four Democrat appointed justices and four Republican appointed justices. There is only one moderate coservative leaning Justice Kennedy who has been deemed the swing vote in major cases. Merrick Garland may have been the perfect choice for this open seat because of his centrist political views. American politics have become so polarized there are barely any moderates left willing to compromise. It’s assumed that there’s no middle ground between those policing Twitter’s micro-aggressions while high on sativa and those waving a gun and screaming about the 2nd amendment as they idolize Sarah Palin. Having a polarized government proves ineffective; it is the moderates that keep the government flowing. Democrats knew the confirmation of Merrick Garland would not be achieved when Donald Trump began promising to fill the spot during his campaign with a judge who is pro-life/anti-abortion.

The GOP not only insulted President Obama by undermining his competency of choosing a nominee but they did not respect the Constitution. Democrat Senators will have to quickly decide if they want to play the game that Republicans have perfected. Senate Democrats have the option to filibuster the confirmation of President Trump’s nominee. After that, the GOP can consider The Nuclear Option, which strips the minority party of the power to filibuster (Wagner & Parker, 2017). Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will have the ability to expand the Nuclear Option   to Supreme Court Nominees if this is where the confirmation is headed. This would mean the GOP would only need a simple majority and Trump’s nominee would be confirmed.

What’s interesting about American politics is how the tables always turn. Now we have a conservative president in office who has nominated a conservative leaning justice. Should the Democrats follow the appointment clause in the Constitution? It seems hypocritical for the GOP to think that this confirmation will be smooth sailing, since this seat should have gone to President Obama’s pick. Republicans never seem to play by the rules when something isn’t in their favor. They are notorious for gerrymandering, or manipulating boundaries to favor a certain party. While this is technically illegal, it contributed to Democrats losing the House of Representatives in recent elections (Ohlemacher, 2014). Many Republican-run states are also in favor or restrictive voting laws that target low-income and/or minority voters and students who tend to vote Democrat. These states try to limit polling stations to areas that are too far in distance for low-income voters, minorities, and students to get to (Roth, 2014).  They also require identification from voters that many low-income minorities and/or students do not have.

Folding to the Republicans by confirming Neil Gorsuch as a justice shows constituents that, once again, the party of bleeding hearts is taking the high road and submitting to the opposition’s foul play. This should have been Merrick Garland’s seat. Confirming the nominee would be following the Constitution and allowing the highest court to continue to run effectively with nine justices.  However, when will enough be enough? Republicans have refused to hear President Obama’s pick, participated in gerrymandering, and are attempting to change voting laws that hurt Democrats, not to mention the fact that government agencies have confirmed that Russia influenced their candidate’s presidential victory! Should Democrats start playing their game? The GOP has been cheating for years. This is a tough decision that Senate Democrats will soon face. Is it time to start standing up to the GOP bullies or will this be business as usual? Dems, the ball is in your court.





Bibliography
Biography. (2017). Antonin Scalia . Retrieved 2017, from Biography: http://www.biography.com/people/antonin-scalia-9473091#synopsis

Board, T. T. (2017 , January 31). When the GOP stole Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court seat, they set the stage for a miserable battle. Retrieved February 1, 2017, from The LA Times : http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-supreme-court-nomination-20170131-story.html

Foundation, T. H. (2012). The Heritage Guide to the Constitution. Retrieved February 1, 2017, from The Heritage Foundation: http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/2/essays/91/appointments-clause

Ohlemacher, S. (2014, March 31). GOP gerrymandering creates uphill fight for Dems in the House. Retrieved February 1, 2017, from PBS: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/gop-gerrymandering-creates-uphill-fight-dems-house/

Roth, Z. (2014, June 18). Texas Republicans call for repealing the Voting Rights Act. Retrieved from MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/texas-republicans-call-repealing-the-voting-rights-act

Wagner, J., & Parker, A. (2017, February 1). Trump endorses use of ‘nuclear option’ to confirm his Supreme Court pick. Retrieved February 1, 2017, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/02/01/trump-endorses-use-of-nuclear-option-to-confirm-his-supreme-court-pick/?utm_term=.182b8fd7aca1

Campaign Promises Turn into Executive Orders

Image by Sammi Cardoso

By Leana Pardo

I think a lot of Americans are wishing they paid a little more attention in history class especially during the unit when the powers of each branch of government were taught. I know I am! When my teacher explained what an executive order was, I should have listened better. Week one of Donald Trump’s presidency has past and numerous signed executive orders was pushed forward. Wasn’t that the foundation of America? Not to have one ruler? To have a checks and balance system? “An executive order is not the president creating new law or appropriating new money from the U.S. Treasury — both things that are the domain of Congress; it is the president instructing the government how it is to work within the parameters that are already set by Congress and the Constitution” (Blake, 2017).  Although many Americans are shocked by how quickly President Trump signed these orders, this is actually pretty normal.

When a new president comes into office, usually the first course of action is the issuance of executive orders. This measure is done to show the American people that campaign promises are kept. Donald Trump’s executive orders are not only scary but not exactly progressive or constitutional. Not to mention his mental health is in question. Executive orders have also been issued in times of crisis. One of the most celebrated executive orders in history was issued by Abraham Lincoln, The Emancipation Proclamation. This was the direct order from the President to abolish slavery. The country was facing a crisis, and it was time for slavery to end in the free world.  Franklin D. Roosevelt also acted in efforts to help America out of the Depression when he signed The New Deal, which had also been done through an executive order. “Roosevelt has the leading number of issued executive orders with 3,721 during his 12-year presidency (Wellford, 2014).” George Bush signed 291[1] executive orders. Barack Obama totaled 277, the fewest since President Cleveland[2]. Obama was coined a dictator by conservatives for having signed the most famous executive order of his career, The Affordable Care Act. He was praised and demonized by many for attempting to grant every American affordable healthcare. He also signed the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals (DACA) as an executive order. This order “exempted the children of illegal immigrants and parents of legal children from deportation (Blake, 2017).” Some executive orders have done great things for this country while others America has shamefully disappointed.

One of the most abominable executive orders in American History was signed by FDR himself which sent Japanese-Americans to internment camps, because the country was at war with Japan. This executive order sounds eerily similar to the recent executive orders signed by President Trump, which targeted Muslim countries. During his first week in office, he signed an executive order that banned citizens from 7 Muslim countries from entering the United States. In the order, he halted the refugee resettlement program to ensure the vetting process was efficient. The United States already has one of the most intricate vetting processes taking up to 18 months to complete. Sadly the same day these orders were signed the world was remembering the Holocaust. Holocaust Remembrance Day was January 27, 2017. Had we paid more attention in high school we would have known that the U.S. denied Jewish refugees in fear of being spies. It wasn’t until the end of the war in 1944 where FDR redeemed himself by issuing an executive order creating the War Refugee Board, which vetted Jewish refugees and allowed them in (Museum, 2016).

In just a few days in office, the new president banned federal scientists from communicating with the press and the public. Scientists went rogue by making alternative Twitter accounts to keep Americans informed of the science world, specifically information regarding climate change. There is no surprise President Trump signed an executive order to start the repeal of Obamacare. As campaigned, the rise of the border wall was initiated when Trump issued a highly anticipated executive order in efforts to crack down on illegal Mexican immigrants. In connection with this executive order, Trump signed for another executive order that denied federal funding to sanctuary cities, or cities that have policies protecting immigrants from deportation.

There has been serious outrage over these executive orders. Nonetheless this is exactly what he said he would do. He wasn’t joking. Granted it’s hard to take an ex-reality-star-turned-president seriously, but this was his campaign. Despite the guy’s Twitter beef and a limited vocabulary, he’s truly pushing forth his agenda. Countless times I heard Trump sympathizers say, “He won’t really build the wall.” Well, he is, and he wants us and Mexico to pay for it. Executive orders have been done in times of crisis, but are we in crisis? Do Muslim refugees shoot up our malls and theaters? Or do Americans in states with lax gun laws do? The biggest threat to America right now is climate change. President Trump has continued to hurt our planet by withholding valuable scientific data from the public. I think American people would rather see executive orders that limit gas emissions to help save the planet, or an order bailing out millions of Americans paying off student debt, among other things.

Executive orders are an essential power given to our president. All presidents have issued them; many have greatly impacted American history. Unfortunately President Trump’s recent executive orders go against America’s principles. The home of the free is banning people from the American Dream; however, this should really come to no surprise. Many have been outraged and shocked by watching Trump’s campaign promises foster into executive orders. The American people have to face the biggest crisis of all. Has a demagogue been elected president? Is there an executive order to ban Trump?

Bibliography

Bialik, K. (2017 , January 23). Obama issued fewer executive orders on average than any president since Cleveland. Retrieved January 2017, 2017, from Pew Reserach Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/23/obama-executive-orders/

Blake, A. (2017, January 27). What is an executive order? And how do President Trump’s stack up? Retrieved January 28, 2017, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/27/what-is-an-executive-order-and-how-do-president-trumps-stack-up/?utm_term=.d52aee946520

Museum, U. S. (2016). UNITED STATES POLICY TOWARD JEWISH REFUGEES, 1941–1952. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007094

Wellford, R. (2014, June 18). Here’s every presidential executive order going back to George Washington. Retrieved January 28, 2017, from PBS.org : http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/table-every-presidential-executive-order/

 

 

[1] (Wellford, 2014)

[2] (Bialik, 2017 )

This is What Democracy Looks Like 

By Leana Pardo

Image by Kathy Hydos

My journey began at 3 am in Newburgh, NY. I was on a bus chartered by one of my good friend’s mother. We were on our way to attend the Women’s March in Washington D.C. Little did we know this would be a historic day in which millions of people (majority of them women) worldwide would march for women’s rights.

Image by Kathy Hydos

When we arrived in D.C., we waited on an hour-long line to board a train heading towards the march. When we entered the packed train car, women were chanting and screaming “Show me what democracy looks like! This is what democracy looks like!,” “Love trumps hate”, and “They go low; we go high!” The train kept stopping underground, because there were floods of people getting on the metro. It took us 3 hours from the time we got off the bus to the time get to the march.

Image by Leana Pardo

When we finally arrived at our stop and piled out onto packed escalators, I saw a sea of women. The chanting continued and got louder. It took us a while to even get out of the train station and when we did it was a surreal moment. I had never seen so many people in my life. The streets were covered with women. An unbelievable site.

Image by Leana Pardo

Women tend to put their needs last. We’re so preoccupied with our children, our jobs, our relationships that we rarely worry about our needs. We tend to cater to men’s egos and put others needs before our own. But this day was about us! The day was about our rights, our solidarity, our strength and our resistance to a man who offended all of us. To see hundreds of thousands of women fighting for their rights was an indescribable feeling.

Image by Kathy Hydos

I was slightly worried about riots since some protestors turned violent the day before at the inauguration. However, it was extremely peaceful. The theme was love and unity. But I could see how a protest could turn ugly fast. It’s so easy to slip to the dark side. I’m not condoning riots and looting. Towards the end of the march after it had been announced that we couldn’t go to the White House due to maximum capacity of people, we stumbled upon Trump International Hotel. It was around 4pm, and I hadn’t sat down since 8 am. I hadn’t had a sip of water since 6 am. I felt a urinary tract infection over the horizon, because I hadn’t peed for ten hours. When we made the turn on Pennsylvania Avenue and saw those golden letters read “TRUMP INTERNATIONAL,” I became instantly angry. I was thirstier, hungrier, more tired, and it was entirely his fault. My friend and I got separated from the others and were taken by the current of streaming protestors. When I realized we had stumbled across his hotel, I looked at her face, and I knew we had the same feelings without speaking. Protestors stopped in front screaming profanities and chanting “shame” with middle fingers held high. Before leaving, we had to pay our respect or more like disrespect to the man that offended the masses. I gave it a quick flip of the bird and kept moving to catch up with the others. I didn’t trust myself to stand in front of this man’s hotel any longer. We had joked that had this been five years ago in the wilder days of our friendship we may have not been so peaceful. But it took an immense amount of discipline to show peaceful resistance at that very moment.

Image by Leana Pardo

My favorite part of the day had to be the signs. Women were extremely creative and hilarious. The signs were priceless. Not only laugh-out-loud hysterical but inspiring. I had met a woman at the train station wearing mock small hands on her fingers poking fun at one of our new president’s many insecurities. Russia was a recurring sign theme, as well. Signs supported immigrants, LGBTQ rights, Black Lives Matter, reproductive rights, affordable healthcare, freedom of press, climate change, equal pay, and people with disabilities were all there, too.

Image by Leana Pardo

On the other hand I noticed that the majority of women were white women. Although the march welcomed all races and a BLM representative spoke, I recognized a lack of black women. Historically feminist movements were for the rights of white women specifically middle-class and high-class white women. This split in races has always been apparent in women’s movements. It’s why Sojourner Truth, ex-slave abolitionist, at the Women’s Convention in 1851 asked the crowd, “Ain’t I a Woman?” This line holds truth in modern feminism. While we’re fighting for women’s rights, are we also fighting for our minority sisters’ rights? In her speech, Truth mentioned watching her children sold into slavery, which helped connect the white mothers to her cause. So, we must ask ourselves: are we fighting for the black mothers that have buried their sons that were unarmed and shot by police? If we’re fighting for women’s rights, we have to fight for all women’s rights. That means acknowledging that black lives matter and acknowledging white privilege. That means standing with black women and fighting for their equality, even if it chips away at our privilege. Activism is contagious and once people start seeing injustice for what it is they tend to start  fighting for all injustices. I can only hope the women at this historic march continue this human rights movement and advocate for ALL women’s rights, and I have a good feeling they will.

Image by Leana Pardo

Our democracy is at stake right now, and people are outraged. If there was ever a time to get involved, it would be now. A common theme from the speakers at the march was that we have the power. We are the majority.

Image by Leana Pardo

After a long day, our bus departed at 7 pm heading back to New York. As we started to drive off our bus coordinator said, “ok, ladies, where to next? North Dakota? Hey, Billy (our bus driver) take us to Standing Rock.” The bus broke out into laughter and mutual agreement. Our beloved leader’s last words embodied my thoughts. I hope those words inspired the rest of the bus filled with these wonderful women and inspires anyone reading this. Although we didn’t detour to North Dakota, it was obvious we did have solidarity and unity, which made us feel empowered to help others in this fight. The women’s march was day one of Trump Resistance, but the fight isn’t over. It was successful, but it’s just the beginning. Staying neutral and not getting involved isn’t taking the high road. It’s submission. If we believe love trumps hate, join the resistance. It’s up to us to stop this. In honor of the women who marched all over the world on Saturday, I’ll use their words, “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.”

Farewell Obama 

Image By Sammi Cardoso

By Leana Pardo

I’m never the one to get emotional about a celebrity death. It didn’t faze me when I heard of the Brangelina divorce either. I have absolutely no connection to these people. I don’t think I’m cold. I think I’m realistic. However, President Obama has surprisingly been an exception. For the past month, I’ve been getting more and more emotional that he will no longer be our commander-in-chief. Personally, under his administration, I felt protected. As a mid-income single mother of two, I felt like he was always watching out for my family and for my friends. I didn’t always agree with him on every issue like foreign policy, but then again I don’t think anyone outside of the Green Party believes in my foreign policy ideology. I felt like my rights were protected.

We tend to forget what life was like 8 years ago. In 2008, we were still at war with Iraq when a young senator from Illinois became the first African-American president of the United States. It’s easy to forget the state this country was in when George W. Bush left–one where we were in a devastating Recession leaving many of us jobless. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2009, one year into President Obama’s term America had roughly a 9% unemployment rate[1]. President Obama acted fast during the Recession and  signed into law the Recovery Act also known as the Stimulus Package which prevented our country from falling into a Depression. Although the act did not accomplish all of its intentions, it did jumpstart a failing economy and most importantly create jobs. “It improved 42,000 miles of road, fixed or replaced 2,700 bridges, and bought more than 12,000 transit vehicles. It cleaned up water supplies, created the school reforms of the Race to the Top program, and greatly expanded the use of renewable energy and broadband Internet service (Board, 2017).” He has greatly supported middle-class Americans by creating the Home Affordable Modification Program which modified home loans that were the result of ballooning mortgages. One of the most important financial reforms in history, The Dodd Frank, was also passed in his first term. This prevented excessive risk-taking by Wall Street leading to The Recession. He championed for the middle class.

Personally, I respect President Obama the most for his stances on civil and human rights. Under President Obama, the Supreme Court voted that gay marriage be legalized. He commended the decision during his second inauguration by saying, “In my second inaugural address, I said that if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal, as well. It is gratifying to see that principle enshrined into law by this decision (Johnson, 2016).” He also reversed Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which was the archaic policy that required members of the LGBTQ to hide who they were. One of the most important and courageous stances President Obama took over the past eight years was the war on drugs and the mass incarceration of minorities. No other president in history has acknowledged how the war on drugs has failed minority communities or visited a federal prison. He has even gone as far as pardoning over 1,000 non-violent drug offenders from their jail sentences. He was a president that sought justice for the disenfranchised and recognized the misdoings of our government to its own people.

His biggest accomplishment would be passing The Affordable Care Act otherwise known as Obamacare. The controversial bill significantly changed American healthcare. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services website, the law is working to make health care more affordable, accessible and of a higher quality, for families, seniors, businesses, and taxpayers alike.  This includes previously uninsured Americans, and Americans who had insurance that didn’t provide them adequate coverage and security[2]. This controversial bill ignited a firestorm of GOP discontent. While people demonized President Obama for this bold move towards a progressive healthcare system, it was easy to stray from the actual goal. Take a minute to think about what President Obama was trying to achieve. He was trying to ensure every American had decent and affordable health insurance. He was guaranteeing that no American be turned away for a pre-existing condition. Was this really a bad thing?

President Obama achieved so much for this country in 8 years. Even making the planet a better place by signing the monumental Paris Agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while he banned oil and gas drilling in parts of the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans– a ban that cannot be removed by Trump. He was the first African-American president and received incredible backlash for it, but he handled it with grace. 

After Donald Trump was elected, I realized how much I would miss Obama. As I watched his farewell address, I was dumbfounded why a man I never met or didn’t know was bringing me to tears. Before the abandonment issues settled in, I felt like one of those people. The ones who carry on at work about how Kim must have felt after Kanye was hospitalized. Or like my mother when she wrote a farewell to Debbie Reynolds and Carrie Fisher on Facebook. And now I get it. He inspired me and greatly affected my family and friends for the past 8 years. He gave me hope. He showed me that maybe someone other than an old white man could run this country and do a damn fine job doing it. He showed me that men in power could be feminists and support women’s issues, as well. When I started to get depressed and anxious for our new leader’s arrival, Obama said two things that stuck with me. These two things made me dry my eyes and allowed optimism to slowly creep in. The first was, “My fellow Americans, it has been the honor of my life to serve you. I won’t stop; in fact, I will be right there with you, as a citizen, for all my days that remain[3].” PHEW! True! He’s still here, but I needed that reassurance. And the last thing, the final inspiration that I think all of us needed was when he said, “I am asking you to believe. Not in my ability to bring about change- but in yours[4].” And to that I asked myself, what am I waiting for? America, it’s our turn for the government to hear our voices. In fifty years from now, I can assure you President Obama will be read in textbooks as one of the greatest presidents of all time. He will be on the right side of history, so let’s join him. Do something. Bring about the change, and let your voice be heard. Farewell and Thank You, Obama!

 

 

 

 

[1] (Statistics, 2017)

[2] (Affairs, 2014)

[3] (Gonzales, 2017)

[4] (Gonzales, 2017)

 

 

Affairs, A. S. (2014, November 14). Key Features of the Affordable Care Act. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from US Department of Health and Human Services: https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts-and-features/key-features-of-aca/

Board, T. E. (2017, February 22). What the Stimulus Accomplished. Retrieved January 16, 2014, from The New York Times : https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/opinion/sunday/what-the-stimulus-accomplished.html

Gonzales, E. (2017, January 10). 21 of the Most Inspiring Quotes From President Obama’s Farewell Address. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from Harper’s Bazaar: http://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/film-tv/news/a19883/president-obamas-farewell-address-best-quotes/

Johnson, B. (2016, August 4). 10 of Obama’s greatest accomplishments. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from Aol.com: http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/04/10-of-obamas-greatest-accomplishments/21444467/

Statistics, B. o. (2017). Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from Bureau of Labor Statistics : https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

 

The True Intent Behind Defunding of Planned Parenthood 

Image by Sammi Cardoso

By Leana Pardo

Ahh yes, it’s that time again when the GOP goes full throttle on attacking women’s reproductive health. House Speaker Paul Ryan announced last week that Republicans will work to dismantle federal funding for Planned Parenthood as they repeal Obamacare. I can remember a few years ago in grad school, my father and I were discussing a women’s right to choose. Mind you my father is someone whose political views can be more moderate than mine but one whose I greatly respect. As an educated feminist, I started firing off abortion facts to him, but halfway through my Margaret-Sanger-inspired speech he cut me off. A pro-choice enthusiast himself looked at me like I was stupid.

“You think that’s what all of this is about? Abortions? You think all of these conservatives really care about saving a fetus? Wake up! They don’t want to pay poor women’s healthcare bills,” he said.

Woke! Shut down by a 60-year-old man on a recliner watching Antiques Roadshow.

My father’s insight humbled me. Was everything really about the money? Of course there are many people who are pro-life and believe abortion is murder. Some for religious reasons while some believe abortion should only be allowed for medical reasons or in the case of rape and incest. However, do all conservatives fall into this category? Does the GOP really despise Planned Parenthood just because they are an abortion provider or was my dear old pop on to something?

When Americans hear Paul Ryan say, “working to defund Planned Parenthood” it is implied that this is a way to stop abortions from being performed, but in reality, this is just not the case. “The money comes not as a lump sum from the federal government, but largely as reimbursements for services provided to patients on public programs like Medicaid—services from cervical cancer screenings to STI testing, but not abortions, for which federal funds are prohibited (Diaz, 2017).” Republicans tend to omit this in their discussions. There is already a law that prohibits these reimbursements of federal funds to go to abortions, called the Hyde Amendment. “Passed by Congress in 1976, the Hyde Amendment excludes abortion from the comprehensive health care services provided to low-income people by the federal government through Medicaid (Union, 2017).” This means Medicaid cannot cover abortion procedures and government funding cannot go to Planned Parenthood’s abortion services.

Since the Hyde Amendment restricts federal funds, 17 states use state funds to provide low-income women with abortions because they believe that any women that wants to terminate a pregnancy should be able to.[1] Unfortunately 32 states plus Washington DC follow the federal standard which only allows funds to be used only in cases of rape, incest or endangerment, and do not allot state funds for abortions.[2] For example; a Medicaid recipient in New York would be able to get an abortion even if her life wasn’t endangered, and the pregnancy wasn’t a product of rape or incest, it would be covered by the state. However if the same woman was living in Alabama she would not be covered, Alabama does not provide subsidies from the state for her to have one. The low income patient would have to pay out of pocket or travel to a different state. So if these restrictions already exist what is the GOP really trying to defund?

To answer this we must analyze who benefits from Planned Parenthood services. Planned Parenthood centers serve 2.5 million people each year, nearly two-thirds rely on public programs like Medicaid to pay for their care[3]. The cuts proposed would greatly affect low-income women’s healthcare and access to affordable birth control. Only 3% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are abortions. The organization mainly provides STD testing, cancer screenings, contraceptives[4] to their low-income patients.

The GOP is not exactly a party that champions for the poor. After analyzing the facts regarding the Hyde Amendment and the services Planned Parenthood provides, one could assume defunding Planned Parenthood is just another attempt by conservatives to reroute funds to the disenfranchised.

 

 

[1] (Foundation, 2017)

[2] (Foundation, 2017)

[3] (Harrington, 2017)

[4] (Harrington, 2017)

 

 

 

Diaz, E. (2017, January 7). Republicans Take Upper Hand in Fight to Defund Planned Parenthood. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from Time : http://time.com/4626516/planned-parenthood-defund-republicans/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+time%2Ftopstories+%28TIME%3A+Top+Stories%29

Harrington, R. (2017, January 5). The fight to defund Planned Parenthood has very little to do with abortions. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from Business Insider : http://www.businessinsider.com/defunding-planned-parenthood-abortions-donald-trump-congress-paul-ryan-republicans-2017-1

Union, A. C. (2017). PUBLIC FUNDING FOR ABORTION. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from American Civil Liberties Union : https://www.aclu.org/other/public-funding-abortion?redirect=public-funding-abortion

 

“Unpresidented” Tweets: The New Presidential Monologue?

Image and Source: http://www.cnn.com

By Leana Pardo

On January 4th, 2017, Bernie Sanders brought an enlarged poster-board of President-Elect Donald Trump’s tweet to the Senate floor.  The tweet was from May 7, 2015 which read, “I was the first & only potential GOP candidate to state there will be no cuts to Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid. Huckabee copied me.” The senator used the visual aid to argue against Republican’s effort to repeal Obamacare and healthcare spending cuts. The tweet not only brought attention to healthcare and failed campaign promises but also to the significance of a 140-character social networking service called Twitter. Twitter has always been a place for many to exercise their freedom of speech. Most recently Trump has been using Twitter to express his intent and presidential agenda. His choice of topics and words has caused some alarm among many mainly because this Twitter abuse seems to be heading down a slippery slope.  Are we heading further down the rabbit hole when our next president tweets about foreign policy matters? Are we at risk when he creates defiant Twitter feuds against others who challenge him? He already took a jab at Arnold Schwarzenegger over ratings since Schwarzenegger’s takeover of The Apprentice. What about when he combatively tweets at political agencies or officials like the United Nations using 140 characters or less? The copy of the tweet not only revealed the misleading rhetoric brought on by Trump’s campaign but also warned the country of future repercussions of Trump’s famous Twitter rants.

Sanders and Trump gained support for explicitly saying what many Americans were thinking. Sanders called out Clinton and the Democratic Party for catering to the rich, which hadn’t been done before by other popular liberal politicians while Trump rallied for Muslim registries and mass deportations that seemed harsh but resonated with millions. Oddly enough, there is something admirable about The Donald when it comes to his anti-establishment and non-politically-correct way of expressing how he feels. His and Sanders online rhetoric greatly differs from the usual delivery of political issues.  In contrast, many politicians, like Hillary Clinton, have a very rehearsed feel to their words.  It seems that nothing they say comes from the heart, and all we truly see is an image they have painted for themselves or rather an image of what they think is best we see. This summons the question of whether or not political matters should be kept private or done more professionally?

Some sound advice for any American dealing with the Internet:

  1. Never post while your emotions are running high.
  2. Don’t send that nasty work email when you’re upset.
  3. Stay away from Instagram right after a bad breakup.
  4. Keep personal business off Facebook.

What about our government tweeting though? Shouldn’t the same unwritten rules apply to lawmakers? Should the whole world know how our president feels about China through a tweet?

Sanders’ presentation of the GOP’s leader’s own words was done to hold Trump accountable for his promises to the American people. But will other countries be as peaceful as a poster board in response to tweets? It’s one thing to start Twitter wars with Alec Baldwin and Chrissy Teigan, but it’s a totally different ball game when you have a Twitter duel with China over nuclear weapons! This was the same infamous tweet of the late spelling of ‘unprecedented’ to ‘unpresidented,’ where it was later corrected after the Twitterverse erupted with the easy ammo.


Image and source: http://www.snopes.com/trump-sends-unpresidented-tweet/

North Korea’s controversial leader Kim Jong-un recently said that North Korea is preparing to test long-range missiles.[1] “Mr. Kim spoke proudly of the strides his country had made in the rise of its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. He declared North Korea would continue to bolster its weapons programs as long as the United States remained hostile and continued its joint military exercises with South Korea” (Sang-Hun, 2017). In response to this chilling news our next president tweeted, “North Korea just stated that it is in the final stages of developing a nuclear weapon capable of reaching parts of the U.S. It won’t happen!” I don’t know if baiting a dictator in possession of nuclear weapons through Twitter is the best way to keep the peace, but it’s certainly alarming.

Image and source: http://gbtimes.com/world/chinese-netizens-react-donald-trumps-north-korea-tweets

It’s a new era to say the least. A seventy-five-year old senator has taken retweeting to the next level, not by typing RT before he reposts but by displaying a printed version of a tweet on the Senate floor. It’s obvious Donald Trump doesn’t play by the rules, but can he at least behave how other Americans are supposed to behave in the workplace? Most Americans would get fired for vicious email rants or for disrespecting colleagues. Why should the president be any different? When the average American doesn’t properly proofread a work email or tweet, we can easily delete, retreat, and send an apology that we were a little emotional that day. The same should apply for the ruler of the free world who holds slightly more responsibility than the Average Joe. Shouldn’t the president’s social media etiquette require a tad bit more vetting? This is more than being inappropriate at the workplace. This is detrimental to foreign policy matters and our safety as Americans.

 

Bibliography

Sang-Hun, C. (2017, January 1). The New York Times . Retrieved January 7, 2017, from Kim Jong-un Says North Korea Is Preparing to Test Long-Range Missile: http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/01/world/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test-kim-jong-un.html?_r=0

[1] (Sang-Hun, 2017)

 

Sang-Hun, C. (2017, January 1). The New York Times . Retrieved January 7, 2017, from Kim Jong-un Says North Korea Is Preparing to Test Long-Range Missile: http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/01/world/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test-kim-jong-un.html?_r=0

 

The Green Rush: Ex-Drug Dealers vs Capitalists in the Legalization of Marijuana

Image by Leana Pardo

By Leana Pardo

During the late 1840’s an influx of people from all over the world flooded the state of California. The forty-niner’s (named after the popular year of 1849) migrated to the West Coast searching of gold after native Californians discovered the shiny metal in the Earth. This period of time is now referred to as the Gold Rush. Fast-forward 160 years and America is experiencing yet another influx to California except this time it’s called the Green Rush. Same premise as the Gold Rush except people are migrating for the green, also known as marijuana, weed, grass, dope, ganga, herb, kush, etc. Marijuana has been around for years. Since its legalization in California and eight other states, people are scurrying like roaches to capitalize on it. This type of green has become the new gold! Investing in marijuana is now considered a smart business move.

After Colorado legalized recreational use of marijuana in 2012, their economy grew. According to The Washington Post, in 2015, the Colorado legal marijuana industry created 18,000 new jobs and generated $2.4 billion in economic activity (Ingraham, 2016). It’s no wonder American capitalists are rushing to these states to get their hands on the dispensary action. As more states aim to legalize, the demand for dispensaries will inevitably rise. But what happens to people that were already in the business before it became legal? The people before corporate investors and entrepreneurs showed face? The ones who have always known the medical benefits of marijuana like how it helps the terminally ill, people in chronic pain, people who suffer anxiety, depression and/or PTSD to name a few? What happens to the people that have been criminalized by the American government and have done time in prison for illegally selling a drug that is now legal in some form by 28 states? Are they still criminals? Can they go back to their profession now with ease? Or is the Green Rush only a business opportunity to the capitalists that simply jumped on the bandwagon after they saw dollar signs?


Image by Sammi Cardoso

In recent years, the war on drugs has come under fire for disproportionately targeting minorities and low-income communities. There are some disconcerting facts around the criminalization of marijuana. Between the years of 2001 to 2010, 8.2 million marijuana arrests have been made and half of all drug arrests were not kingpin drug dealers but Americans that have a small amount of pot (Union, 2016). Imagine going to jail for having marijuana in Utah while your neighbors across the border in Colorado are puffing easily at a legalized cannabis cafe. Oh, Calamity! The joys of federalism. What’s even more unjust is that despite equal usage rates, blacks are 3.7 times more likely to get arrested for marijuana than whites are (Union, 2016). Now if we apply these facts to the Green Rush, the legal distribution of marijuana is not very exciting for the seasoned professionals that have been doing this for years. Unfortunately many provisions in legalized states can forbid people with felonies from getting licenses to sell.

Minorities have been the most negatively impacted from the war on drugs. These laws may seem a bit biased, because they are excluding many from this golden opportunity. California may soon deny continuation of business for middle-class entrepreneurs who are now legally dispensing marijuana who previously had a drug felony. The law states, “[the state] “may” deny a license to an applicant who has been convicted of an offense that is “substantially related to the qualifications, functions or duties of the business” he or she wants to operate” (McGreevy, 2016). In laymen’s terms, if one has been previously convicted of a drug charge–even if its marijuana–which is now legal, one can be denied the right to sell. And to confuse matters even more if one is selling marijuana without a license it’s considered illegal.

This has been an ongoing debate after the legalization of marijuana in Colorado. In Colorado, “Drug felons are allowed to work in the recreational pot industry after five years with a clean record if the crimes for which they were convicted wouldn’t be a crime under current marijuana law (Wyatt, 2015).” Some lawmakers do not agree like Rep Gordan Klingenschmitt (R-Colorado Springs) who said, “if we want to legitimize the industry, the last thing we want to do is put convicted felons in charge of running this industry.”

Currently half of the United States has some form of legal marijuana meaning as the legalization of marijuana progresses, lawmakers will be confronted with this issue. Should felons, previously convicted of dispensing marijuana, be allowed to get back in the business they know so well? Or should they still carry around the title of criminal for a crime that has been decriminalized? Understanding the war on drugs and how minorities were disproportionately targeted, shouldn’t this be a way for America to repent their wrongs? We could never give back the time people have spent in jail for a plant safer than alcohol. The least lawmakers could do is give them a shot at the Green Rush. It was their industry first. Besides, wouldn’t you rather support your local business?


Image by Sammi Cardoso

Bibliography

Geiger, A. (2016, October 12 ). Support for marijuana legalization continues to rise. Retrieved December 10 , 2016, from Pew Research Center: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/10/12/support-for-marijuana-legalization-continues-to-rise/

Ingraham, C. (2016, October 27). The marijuana industry created more than 18,000 new jobs in Colorado last year. Retrieved 12 10, 2016, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/27/the-marijuana-industry-created-over-18000-new-jobs-in-colorado-last-year/?utm_term=.7db83c22dae2

McGreevy, P. (2016, May 13). New law could put some medical marijuana dispensaries out of business. Retrieved December 10, 2016, from L.A. Times: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-pot-dispensary-felon-owners-20160513-story.html

Union, A. C. (2016). THE WAR ON MARIJUANA IN BLACK AND WHITE. Retrieved December 10, 2016, from American Civil Liberties Union: https://www.aclu.org/feature/war-marijuana-black-and-white

Wyatt, K. (2015, May 5). Dispute Over Felons In Pot Industry Flares At Statehouse. Retrieved December 10, 2016, from Denver CBS Local News : http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/05/05/dispute-over-felons-in-pot-industry-flares-at-statehouse/

Is it Over Yet: A Recap of 2016


Images by Sammi Cardoso 

This post is in loving memory of Brian D. Murphy. He was personally my greatest loss in 2016. He was a bleeding liberal, a staunch feminist, a gay rights advocate who once called me from the 2004 Republican National  Convention chanting “we say no Bush must go” with other protesters. He’s not physically with us anymore but his unmatchable energy, kindness and laughter is a legacy that will never die.

By Leana Pardo

With the start of a new year, everyone is optimistic and jovial. When 2016’s spirit declined rapidly, it annihilated us all. Memes began circulating the Internet poking fun of 2016. It brought light to a confusing and an appalling year. With the death of iconic staples of American culture like Maurice White, Prince, David Bowie, Muhammad Ali, George Michael, Janet Reno, & Carrie Fisher—just to name a few—to electing Donald Trump to govern the U.S, we can easily agree that 2016 was one hot mess.

The jaw-dropping news started early January when a state of emergency was issued for Flint, Michigan. The city’s water supply had been tested for an elevated percentage of lead that had been harming the residents for over a year. The issue has yet to be resolved while we move into 2017!

In February, American conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonio Scalia passed away at 79. The famous judge who once said, “Get over it” after the Bush vs. Gore election has still not been replaced. The Republican-held Congress has since refused to hold hearings to confirm President Obama’s choice.

The powerhouse politician, Senator Bernie Sanders, 75, started a revolution, which received overwhelming support from the millennial generation. The nation watched Sanders become a political superstar as he ran a campaign that raised millions of dollars through small contributions. His democratic and socialist policies resonated with Americans causing stiff competition for Hillary Clinton. 


Although Sanders fought a good fight, the Democratic nomination soon went to Hillary Clinton who became the first woman in American history to be nominated for a major U.S. political party. During her campaign, Clinton struggled when America discovered she had been using her personal server while on duty as Secretary of State. Her campaign did not recover from this mishap.

Way to the right (pun intended), Donald Trump secured the GOP nomination by indoctrinating and promising to make America great again. Trump tapped into an audience the Clinton campaign and supporters often criticized and overlooked during the campaign. He built a hateful platform on promises like building a wall to keep immigrants out of the country and planning a Muslim registry.

In June, we learned of the tragic shooting in Orlando, FL, at a gay nightclub, Pulse, leaving 49 people killed and 53 injured. The gunman who later died pledged allegiance to ISIS. This was considered the deadliest shooting in modern American history, which has left many desensitized to gun violence and mass shootings in America. 

In early July, the country was heartbroken after watching footage of African-American, Philando Castile, get fatally shot at a routine traffic stop in front of his wife and four-year-old daughter. Along with Philando Castile, Terence Crutcher, Alton Sterling, Carnell Snell Jr., and Gregory Gunn also fell to their death at the release of a bullet from the hands of law enforcement. These tragedies were added to the ongoing list of unarmed black men killed by police. These are just a few names on this list from 2016.

On July 7th in Dallas, TX, a peaceful protest was coming to an end when a lone gunman fatally shot five police officers and wounded nine heightening tension in America between Black Lives Matter supporters and the police. 

On a lighter note, there were wins for progressive politics. In April, California became the first state to raise the minimum wage over the next six years to $15 an hour. New York signed a similar minimum wage bill leaving hopes for the future. In November, California also legalized the recreational use of marijuana while also signing legislation and the Paris agreement, which pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% in the next century. The Paris agreement was signed in April 2016 and became effective November 2016. Side note: President- Elect Trump vows to withdraw from this agreement. Moral of the story: let’s move to California or to another country.

Over 300 Native American tribes joined together at Standing Rock, North Dakota in one of the largest Native American protest in American history. The tribes protested the Dakota Access Pipeline that was set to disrupt their water supply. In December, the Army Corps announced that the pipeline would be rerouted and construction would halt. 

Undoubtedly the most shocking event was the election of Donald Trump for the next president of the United States. Hillary Clinton historically won over 2.5 million popular votes while Trump won the Electoral College vote, which only happened four other times in history. The tweet-crazed-politically-incorrect reality star promised anti-establishment but since the election has appointed a billionaire pro-establishment-infested cabinet.

 Image by Leana Pardo 

On December 19th, the Electoral College had their last chance to cast their final vote faithfully or faithlessly to officiate the presidency. During this time, many non-Trump supporters used this opportunity to declare democracy and exercise their rights. Oddly enough, a few days before the election, the FBI re-opened the doors to the email scandal adding to Hilary’s downfall. In retrospect, a few days before the Electoral College casted their final vote, the CIA presented evidence that there was Russian interference in the election. Many argued that Hillary’s email scandal did not provide enough evidence while the evidence of Russian interference was more prevalent to deny Trump the presidency. Despite the demand for investigation, electors voted faithfully in Trump’s favor leaving Hillary yet again at a loss. 2017 seems foggy and unexpected, but the best can be hoped for after January 20th.

Our hearts went out to the people of Eastern Aleppo who suffered and continue to suffer a detrimental civil war. Citizens of Aleppo posted videos on social media outlets describing their horrific situations while declaring their soon-to-be death in efforts to seek help. While Americans argued over allowing refugees in and Russia’s involvement in the war, we saw a fragile five-year-old, Omran Daqneesh, sit in an ambulance vehicle and wipe blood and soot from his tiny face. We watched mothers and fathers cry searching desperately for their children buried in rubble and The White Helmets risk their lives to save them. 

2016 was undeniably a rough year filled with great loss, but there are two options in the aftermath. We either: 1) Sulk and quit or 2) Continue and persevere. When you experience loss, your world tilts and your senses change. You begin to see things differently. Your eyes catch a different perspective of the world. You take deeper breaths. You feel things more intensely, and you listen differently. You start hearing the subtle things you may have missed before. A loss of any kind changes your perspective. And you can either shut down or grow from it.

As we leave 2016 behind us, we can choose to sit in fear waiting for the next mass shooting and/or anticipating the worst from a new administration. Alternatively, we can choose to continue and push through the grief. From my experience with grief, the latter is proving more effective. Maybe 2016 was America’s wake-up call. Maybe we needed our senses shaken up. It’s time to see the world from a different lens and channel the energy of the ones we lost and the ones we lost during political races to make for a better 2017.